Dr. Rajat having 12 years of experience in private dental practice.Fellowship from the American Academy of Dentofacial Implant Dentistry, New York, USA. Fellow the International Institute of Replacement Therapy, 2012 and presented over 1000 cases in implant modalities 2004 (London) Advanced training in Occlusion the Institute of L D Pankey Association, Master training in Implantology with CE 1500 hours of training from the Tatum Implant & Reconstructive Surgery Institute
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Sinus lifting & Grafting Clinical Training
Extensive SINUS GRAFTING COURSE
1. Diagnosis and appropriate treatment planning of
the sinus lifting case & sinus grafting technique
2. Successfully performing the lateral as well as
crestal approaches in their clinical practice.
3. Update about the appropriate graft material for
sinus lift surgery
4. Upscale by Harvesting autogenous bone for sinus
grafting
5. How to minimize the post operative complications
Duration
:- 2
days
|
The Course workshop is aimed to
DAY 1:- Sinus Manipulation (basic to intermediate)
Ø Anatomic
considerations of posterior maxilla & maxillary sinus
Ø Limitations
with posterior maxilla
Ø Guidelines
for successful implant therapy in posterior maxilla
Ø Sinus
grafting biomaterials
Ø Indications
for sinus grafting & Contraindications for sinus grafting
Ø Armamentariums
required to perform sinus grafting
Ø CT
planning of cases with advanced implant planning software
Ø Drugs
regime for pre & post sinus graft procedure
Ø Sinus
lift procedure
Ø D
fin placement using nasal floor & maxillary sinus lift procedure
Ø Sinus
grafting techniques with or without Implants
Ø Sinus
floor immediate distraction technique
Ø Removing
buttresses
Hands
on: - sinus lift procedure on goats head specimen using piezosurgery unit.
DAY 2 :- Sinus lifting & grafting
(intermediate to advanced)
Ø Conventional
Surgical Techniques – Indirect & Direct sinus manipulation
Ø Conventional
Lateral Window approach – step by step demonstration
Ø Newer
modified sinus lift techniques for the lateral approach
Ø Different
modalities for sinus augmentation
Ø Lateral
Sinus lift technique using piezo surgery unit
Ø Lateral
approach for sinus grafting using DASK
Ø Crestal
(Osteotome) approach/internal sinus lift technique along with modified
approach
Ø Advantages
and disadvantages of the crestal Osteotome technique
Ø Bicortical
engagement without sinus grafting
Ø Key
facts for implant osteotomy post sinus lifting
Ø Sinus
lifting with crestal approach using DASK
Ø Ballooning
technique
Ø Hydraulic
sinus lift technique
Ø Intra
lift technique
Ø Complications
associated with sinus graft surgery and their managements
|
Wednesday, March 9, 2016
Monday, March 7, 2016
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Edentulous Mandible: Implant – Retained
Overdenture
Overdentures
get support and retention from a superstructure attached to the implants. This
superstructure defines the character of the denture that can be provided. We
differentiate between tissue-supported, tissue/implant-supported, and mainly
implant-supported overdentures.
In
tissue-supported overdentures, the retentive mechanism of choice is a magnet, a
ball attachment, a locator attachment, or a conical crown.
Tissue/implant-supported overdentures get their retention via a superstructure
consisting of two implants interconnected by a bar attached to gold caps that
in turn are screwed onto the implants.
Implant-supported overdentures rest
primarily superstructure connected to the implants. The superstructure is
placed on at least four implants, to interconnect them.
Patients
with an edentulous mandible may experience problems with conventional dentures,
such as a lack of retention and problems concerning self-esteem. Any fixed
dental prosthesis on implants or implant-supported overdenture increases
patient satisfaction.
Furthermore,
research has shown that a one-phase implant insertion technique can achieve the
same good results as a two-phase technique. This would mean that one-phase
technique is more patient-friendly, because a second surgical stage is no
longer required.
SURGICAL
GUIDE
A surgical guide to the edentulous mandible
can be based on an existing functional denture or on a wax-up of the new dental
prosthesis in the correct maxillomandible relationship in an articulator.
Implants in the edentulous mandible intended to supporting an overdenture are
inserted between the two mental foramina.
They should be equidistant from the
midline, and the inter-implant distance should be between 15 to 20 mm. When
inserting four implants, the most distal one must be placed about 5mm mesially
of the mental foramina.
TWO
UNSPLINTED IMPLANTS AND AN OVERDENTURE
Two implants
with ball and clip attachments should be adequate where the mandible has the height
of at least 10 mm and a patient requests more stability and retention for
complete denture. Two implants with ball attachments, Locater abutments,
magnets or telescopic crown are most often used when the patient’s oral hygiene
is a problem.
An insufficient vertical dimension or a tapered shape alveolar
ridge would lead to a bar design covering the frenulum of the tongue, thus
impairing the function.
TWO
SPLINTED IMPLANTS AND AN OVERDENTURE
With two
implants interconnected by a bar as a treatment option, the implants are
frequently placed at or mesially of the position of the canine teeth. The bar
should be placed directly below the incisal edges of the lower teeth.
This
reduces the tendency of the mandibular denture to rotate around the fulcrum
created between the two abutments. With a bar and clip on two implants, it is
advisable not to use a round bar, since this facilitate denture rotation.
Benefits:
Higher stability and retention of the overdenture
Limitation:
Not applicable in the V-profile mandibles and where the residual height of the
mandible is less than 10 mm. Oral hygiene is more demanding.
FOUR (OR
MORE) SPLINTED IMPLANTS AND AN OVERDENTURE
Four
implants and a bar and clip mesostructure are advisable when the alveolar bone
height is less than 10 mm, since the bone-to-implant surface area becomes
relatively limited when shorter implants are inserted. Four interconnected
implants should also be inserted if the opposing jaw has (Partial) natural
dentition.
FIXED
DENTAL PROSTHESIS IN THE EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE
As a patient
cannot remove the FDP, oral hygiene is important. Not all edentulous patients
can be considered good candidates for FDP’s as they are not capable of their
oral hygiene.
An FDP can
only be considered if sufficient lip support can be provided. Diagnosis
treatment planning, Crossbites, maxillomandibular relations , intermaxillary
space, and so on must analyzed properly. As Prosthodontics dictates the amount,
site, and type of implant, a mockup is essential.
For further information join the next batch of Comprehensive Implant Training in India: www.sachdevadentalcare.com or www.dentalcoursesdelhi.com
Regards :
Dr.Prof .Rajat Sachdeva
+919818894041,01142464041
Ridge Splitting in implantology
Ridge splitting for
lateral ridge augmentation
An
alternative method of augmenting a narrow ridge is by ridge splitting instead
of onlay grafting. This technique can be applied in selected cases. It requires
that the alveolar ridge has two cortical plates separated by a layer of
cancellous bone in a preoperative CBCT image. This situation is normally
confined to alveolar ridges featuring an orofacial thickness of more than 4mm.
Ridge splitting can be performed simultaneously with implant
placement. This is the only way to obtain primary stability in this scenario is
by engaging the bone at the apical region of the implant. In selected cases, it
may be possible to stabilize the mobilized buccal plate with bone screws if
required.
It is advisable to perform the splitting with minimal flap
reflection to expose only the crestal region of the ridge. A somewhat higher
level of surgical skill and experience is needed for flapless ridge splitting
compared to conventional bone grafting .
The main indication for ridge splitting is to expand a
horizontally reduced ridge in the maxilla and take advantage of elastic and
cancellous quality of this bone and its peripheral type of blood perfusion.
Splitting a narrow mandibular ridge is possible but
technically more difficult due to brittle, thicker, and more cortical nature of
this bone .
A flapless approach in the maxilla offers the benefits that
even small bone fragments remain attached to periosteum and are contained by
the intact soft-tissue envelope. On balance, ridge expansion via splitting is
effective but does have its limitations.
Onlay bone grafting, with addition to particulated grafts and
a membrane for protection, is the more versatile and widely used approach
For more details, join the next batch of Advanced Implants
Continuum: www.sachdevadentalcare.com or www.dentalcoursesdelhi.com
Regards :Dr.Prof.Rajat Sachdeva
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


